Network / A point of departure

A thought, connected.

Original replies are recorded connections. Shared projects and topics are editorial paths through the selected archive.

Jack Butcher /

https://t.co/phCWYWV7oE

Original on X ↗Read in context →

Source and context

Exact text from the November 2025 account export. Dates are UTC. This is a selected post; other replies and attachments may be outside this view. Historical rules and figures describe the time of writing.

The 12 January checkmark is preserved as a response, not treated on its own as a transaction-level proof that the threshold was crossed.

Full Set: the condition for a collective change

Project documentation: Full Set

Connections around the selected postYOU ARE HERE10 January 2025012025-01-10022025-01-11032025-01-12042025-02-14052024-10-30062025-09-30072025-09-30082024-03-21
Solid line: original reply. Dotted line: a shared reading record, project or editorial topic.

Choose a number, or follow a post below.

Follow a connection

8 paths from here
  1. 01 / The post this replies to

    I’ve been responding to the platform constraints of Rodeo through a collection of 26 pieces capturing its dynamics, each minted with unique imagery (below left). Upon discovering that tokens could be updated to point to new images, the orig…

    Follow this thought →
  2. 02 / A reply to this post

    69% complete 3.5 hours left

    Follow this thought →
  3. 03 / Same selected reading record

    Follow this thought →
  4. 04 / Editorial topic: Participation

    listened to opepen space thanks all for the candid thoughts agreed that consensus on the full sets is very difficult to get through at the moment, partly attention elsewhere, partly complexity, partly marketing, etc some view the difficulty…

    Follow this thought →
  5. 05 / Editorial topic: Constraints

    what began as black and white compositions explaining value mechanics evolved into blockchain projects using those same mechanics as their medium. pieces about consensus, immutability, and network effects became pieces powered by consensus,…

    Follow this thought →
  6. 06 / Editorial topic: Participation

    $rounds is an erc20 with a max supply of 1,482 indivisible tokens it will be claimable by all gas wars holders (500 tokens) and all failed gas wars minters (982 wallets)

    Follow this thought →
  7. 07 / Editorial topic: Participation

    it will grant access to participate in the final piece of gas wars artwork it has zero inherent value, trade at your own risk

    Follow this thought →
  8. 08 / Editorial topic: Participation

    after careful consideration we're going to adjust the mechanism to only allow for one opepen to be opted-in to a single set at a time currently there's a "waterfall" type logic where you can opt into multiple, but it's distorting signal num…

    Follow this thought →

← Find another starting point