Network / A point of departure

A thought, connected.

Original replies are recorded connections. Shared projects and topics are editorial paths through the selected archive.

Jack Butcher /

elements monoprint claim is now live (site will only ask you for a signature, no transactions required) nfts will now reflect claim status (single) vs. (pair) thank you for your support and your patience, means more than I can convey on twitter https://t.co/EaQlsC4Eke https://t.co/2s8ppRNaZU

Original on X ↗Read in context →

Source and context

Exact text from the November 2025 account export. Dates are UTC. This is a selected post; other replies and attachments may be outside this view. Historical rules and figures describe the time of writing.

The post announces availability and describes the interface at that date. It is not current claim guidance or a record of every completed delivery.

Checks Elements: the print claim
Physical / digitalVerification

Project documentation: Checks Elements

Connections around the selected postYOU ARE HERE17 July 2023012023-12-08022023-12-12032023-01-07042023-12-08052023-12-08062023-12-12072023-12-12082023-01-07
Solid line: original reply. Dotted line: a shared reading record, project or editorial topic.

Choose a number, or follow a post below.

Follow a connection

8 paths from here
  1. 01 / Editorial topic: Physical / digital

    oviators is a collaboration w/ @SalvinoArmati minting on base for .11 eth for the next 72 hours to determine final supply an nft that will be redeemable for a physical pair of oviators in q1 2024 on redemption your token will transform into…

    Follow this thought →
  2. 02 / Editorial topic: Verification

    @ChristiesInc @nftnow have been consumed by a couple things since this launched and haven't gotten around to sharing some of the details the info layer here (press n) reveals the data that informs each signature (rotations & total circumfer…

    Follow this thought →
  3. 03 / Editorial topic: Physical / digital

    This is not what we are going to do, but an important precedent to recognize. Next steps for Checks — checking technical feasibility on a few things, and double checking some math. Will be back to share soon, thanks for reading.

    Follow this thought →
  4. 04 / Editorial topic: Physical / digital

    have to shout out the incredible craft on both the product and the technical side, everything you see is the work of @SalvinoArmati and team and thank you to everyone engaging with the preview site, 4,000+ total ovopepens built

    Follow this thought →
  5. 05 / Editorial topic: Physical / digital

    we have a few prototypes with us in miami, come through the gallery in wynwood to try them on and take a snap (316 NW 25th, 3pm every day) & all one check holders all get a pair on me oviators dot com

    Follow this thought →
  6. 06 / Editorial topic: Verification

    @ChristiesInc @nftnow any signature drawn "organically" (by a human) is absolutely unique, even if visually similar the above are not drawn hand drawn, but the code that ensures their randomness is the below are hand drawn, an extension of…

    Follow this thought →
  7. 07 / Editorial topic: Verification

    @ChristiesInc @nftnow attribution, provenance, proof all different lenses on the same set of questions provoked by the ability to distribute consensus and verify independently

    Follow this thought →
  8. 08 / Editorial topic: Physical / digital

    A lengthier detour than planned, correction below: The majority of the market opted for the physical version.

    Follow this thought →

← Find another starting point